Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Joey Ramone, redneck humor and Liberty Valance

There tend to be two ways of thinking about history: Either it was your favorite subject in school, or you couldn't stand it and the memorization of names, dates and places.

In either case, I hypothesize that history � regardless of which end of the spectrum it falls on for you � is America's worst subject.

I recently was told a story about a workplace quiz competition centered on U.S. history. The person telling this story wholly admits to not knowing enough about history in general, U.S. history in specific.

And guess who ran away with the competition? Apparently, the other contestants were taken aback by anyone who might have a snowball's chance against the youngsters on the Jeff Foxworthy-hosted "Are You Smarter Than A Fifth-Grader?"

Show me one fifth-grader that, when asked about the cause of the American Civil War, can say anything beyond "slavery" and "states' rights," and I will show you a set of parents and teachers who are getting it right.

But I digress.

As someone who divided his time equally between history classes in college and the campus paper's newsroom, I like to think I've got a decent grasp on where this country has been and what it's seen for a person of my age.

But I must acknowledge that my education in history was flawed long before I first stepped on university ground.

There was the teacher who thought "blitzkrieg" was a German tactic � and an American word. This qualifies as a half-truth.

She might have been more familiar with another usage of the word:



By no coincidence, this was the same teacher who relied heavily on an ABC News-produced video series to make sure we had our historical bases covered without us thinking bad of her for forcing us to (*GASP*) listen to lectures, read books and take copious notes.

But in defense of Mrs. Duck (names have been changed to protect the innocent, just like Jack Webb), she introduced me to the work of John Ford, easily the greatest director in the history of cinema.

If anything should be required viewing to middle- and high-school students, it's "The Grapes of Wrath" and its mournful refrain of "Red River Valley."

But as much as Joey Ramone, John Ford and the rest of the canon of entertainers dabbled with thoughts and phrases regarding the American experience, it only does so much.

"The Grapes of Wrath" is a great movie, but it's not a documentary. It's based on a novel. Actor and comedian Robert Wuhl recently proclaimed his own hypothesis of history being "based on a true story." This may be the case here.

For that matter, Mel Gibson's biggest box-office hit was not, in fact, an honest-to-God presentation of the Greatest Story Ever Told. But that won't stop legions of the faithful from thinking "The Passion" to be pretty close to how it all happened, if it did at all.

But it was a good movie, right?

Thank goodness "Pearl Harbor" was roundly dismissed as a bad movie, lest we be lead to believe good ole Jimmy Doolittle looked or sounded the least bit like Alec Baldwin.

But accepting the history in movies when we shouldn't (or at least buying into its authenticity more than we should) is mostly our own individual faults.

How any student gets out of high school only knowing Julius Caesar from a week of Shakespeare in theater class is quite troubling to me, if only for the fact that this actually happens today in the U.S. public school system.

But don't get me wrong. I have nothing against public schools or the hard-working people who keep them up and running. My mother, a public school teacher for the vast majority of her adult life, is one of those people who endures the administrative headaches and daily crises to make sure that her students are not just being shuffled along, grade to grade, year to year, to make sure enough kids graduate each year that they can stay in a community's good graces despite struggling with the mandates of No Child Left Behind and AYP.

I merely think it's important for everyone to play a strong role in developing a young person's desire to learn, and history is the best place to start. Even if little Billy ends up thinking a young Tom Hanks went up to the Zoltar machine, grew into a man overnight, worked on Death Row during the Great Depression before going off to find Matt Damon in France during the Second World War, there's a decent chance of Billy heading to the library for a copy of Tom H. Watkins' "The Hungry Years" or a biography of Dwight D. Eisenhower.

"When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." � Maxwell Scott in "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance"

Read more...

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

The rise and fall of John McCain

The rise and fall of John McCain Do you remember the 2000 presidential campaign as well as I do? Just shortly after George W. Bush became the sentimental choice within Republican circles to be 'the guy' to restore dignity to the Oval Office, John McCain quietly started his hope-filled (and ultimately disastrous) quest for the White House. Did the wave of McCain popularity truly crest the night of the 2000 New Hampshire GOP primary, in which McCain rocked the vote and wrestled a victory away from Bush? From there, the Bush machine destroyed McCain in the South, most notably the South Carolina primary and the insinuations about a biracial child out of wedlock. And that was it. McCain and his Straight Talk Express took aim at the Religious Right and Bush's decision to visit Bob Jones University � this effectively ended his chances of securing the GOP nomination. But as the dust settled on one of the most contentious presidential elections in American history, John McCain went back to his Senate seat and did little else to burn bridges with the cross-section of America that fell in love with his unique platform and even more unique method of spreading the word: the Straight Talk Express. Then came the war and the 2004 presidential election.

With the unpopular invasion of Iraq putting dents in President Bush�s bloc of support from Conservative America and the first in many waves to turn the tide toward a Democratic-controlled Congress in 2006, McCain got caught in an undertow.

Ever since throwing his support behind President Bush in 2004, John McCain has engaged in a mind-bendingly curious campaign to cozy up to the Far Right in America.

McCain had long been reviled in conservative sects, a pi�ata for the talk radio crowd � and he never had a chance of winning them over.

How has McCain engaged in this futile effort?

1. McCain supported the invasion of Iraq and has said the world is better off without Saddam Hussein. At the same time, he has expressed personal disdain for former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld�s performance yet would not demand his resignation.

2. McCain, as recently as February 2007, stated he believes the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling should be overturned.

3. McCain supports the teaching of intelligent design in public schools.

4. McCain jokingly insinuated to an audience that the U.S. military should bomb Iran.

Conversely, McCain has held strong to some key ideas that keep him firmly at odds with the Pat Robertson crowd:

1. McCain, a former POW, has opposed the Bush administration�s willingness to condone degrading and harmful detainee treatment, bordering on torture.

2. McCain is no fan of the much-ballyhooed Mexican border fence touted by the anti-immigration crowd.

3. McCain supports embryonic stem cell research.

4. McCain was a member of the �Gang of 14,� which sought to bring a bipartisan solution to the contentious debate over President Bush�s judicial nominees and the Republican majority�s ability to use the �nuclear option� to end Democratic filibusters.

As much as McCain�s mixed platform in 2000 won broad support, his move to the right while holding some decidedly liberal-leaning positions since 2004 has fallen flat with many conservatives, legions of independents and most liberals.

And now word is out that Senator McCain�s 2008 presidential campaign has failed to keep up with fundraising compared to Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani. McCain has also suffered major shakeups within his brain trust, most recently the resignations of John Weaver and Terry Nelson.

Some pundits have likened this development to President Bush operating without political mastermind Karl Rove.

But who knows? If Weaver and Nelson helped craft McCain into the failed candidate he is in 2007, I must imagine the pugnacious Senator McCain could possibly revive some of the magic he had in 2000 before the primaries of 2008.

But as a betting man, I must put my money not on what Senator McCain would wear to his inauguration in early 2009, but rather when the death knell for his presidential prospects sound off.

Is it possible I�ve already missed the bus on placing that bet? Just as well. That bus was probably the Straight Talk Express, and it could just as easily be rested in rubble somewhere at the bottom of the Grand Canyon.

�Tried faith all worn and thin / for all we could have done / and all that could have been.�



Read more...

About This Blog

The once and future savage outpost for my semi-meaningful thoughts and monologues that are too long for Twitter and not good enough to be sprawled across the front page of every major metropolitan newspaper in America with 120-pt. headlines. Also, the occasional diversion via YouTube.

Meditate On This

Most of the great artists never live to see their work truly appreciated on a global scale... Vincent van Gogh. Johann Sebastian Bach. Keyboard Cat.

  © Blogger template Coozie by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP